You are the owner of this article.
You have permission to edit this article.

County votes to remove flag from seal, hears report on justice system project

Fate of county seal now rests with state

  • Updated
  • 0
  • 5 min to read
Rogers Anderson

Williamson County Mayor Rogers Anderson speaks in front of the Williamson County Commission. 

This month’s Williamson County Board of Commissioners meeting was loaded with two major issues — a vote for the removal of the Confederate flag from the Williamson County seal and a report concerning what Mayor Rogers Anderson called “the single largest project Williamson County has ever embarked on.”

After controversy around the Confederate flag in the upper-left quadrant of the county seal sparked an online petition calling for the flag’s removal, the commission voted to form a task force to study the community impacts of an alteration to the seal, gather public input and make a recommendation to the commission concerning the alteration of the seal. Late last month, the task force unanimously voted to recommend the removal of the flag from the seal.

Williamson County Seal

The Confederate flag in the Williamson County seal has sparked controversy among some members of the community.

Matt Largen, president and CEO of Williamson, Inc. and the chairman of the county seal task force, presented the report to the commission, and after some discussion, the commission adopted the report and its recommendation to remove the flag with a 16-7 vote.

Votes for the removal of the flag included Commissioners Sean Aiello, Robbie Beal, Brian Beathard, Keith Hudson, Ricky Jones, David Landrum, Gregg Lawrence, Tommy Little, Beth Lothers, Jennifer Mason, Chas Morton, Steve Smith, Chad Story, Tom Tunnicliffe, Paul Webb and Matt Williams. Votes against included Commissioners Bert Chalfant, Judy Herbert, Betsy Hester, Dwight Jones, Erin Nations, Jerry Rainey and Barbara Sturgeon. Commissioner Dana Ausbrooks was absent.

The mayor’s office will now send a request to the Tennessee Historical Commission to alter the seal, which must be approved by a two-thirds majority vote. Should the state approve the request, the county would then have the authority to alter or redesign the seal as it sees fit. The commission would also have the option to rid itself of a seal altogether.

Read the task force’s full report at

Commissioners discuss the seal

Prior to the vote, several commissioners expressed their thoughts on the matter.

Hester, District 2 commissioner, said she has constituents who have also expressed dismay with other quadrants of the seal, such as the bottom-left with the Bible and stained-glass window and the bottom-right with the cow and horse. She suggested the commission defer the vote until November. This was an unofficial suggestion that was not put to a vote.

Sturgeon, of District 8, said she would support a deferral.

“In a time like right now in America where there’s a rush to remove our heritage, a rush to remove anything that symbolizes our history and what makes America America, I think it’s a terrible time to be erasing something from our seal,” she said. “I’m really upset about the idea of dishonoring the soldiers that died in the Civil War because that’s what the flag was put on the cannon for. … That’s what it meant originally, and I don’t think the meaning is changed just because some people have decided that the Confederate flag is racist.”  

Hudson, of District 3, said he would not support a deferral but believed some of the other commissioners would support a deferral “to push it back further and further and further without voting at all.” He also said he believed some commissioners went into the meeting already knowing how they would vote.

“I agree that there may be a portion of heritage, but you can’t deny in this diverse county that this is a symbol of universal hate,” Hudson said.

Lothers, of District 5, shared her support of removing the flag from the seal, mentioning the U.S. Census indicates that during the time of the Civil War, Williamson County had about 11,000 white settlers and 12,000 African American slaves and that the Battle of Franklin was “devastating to so many of our local families.”

“There is a collective loss and there’s an individual loss, and what the flag represents for those who are memorialized under it as the individuals that they loved — to me, it is not discredited by admitting that descendants of those slaves that actually built our county alongside of every other white settler have to also be represented on our county seal,” Lothers said.

Lawrence, of District 4, said he reached out to Jody Bowman, son of seal co-designer Virginia Bowman, to ask what his mother would’ve thought of the issue.

“He said he thought that she would just say to do away with the seal entirely instead of having a rancorous debate,” Lawrence said, pointing out that 48 Tennessee counties do not have a seal while 47 do.

Proposal for justice system facility improvements

The commission also heard an update on the JJJ project, which seeks to improve the facilities and operations of the county jail, sheriff’s office, juvenile services and courts.

Jeff Kuhnhenn, an architectural consultant with Gresham Smith, shared the assessment and recommendations are largely driven by the projected population growth in the county.

“Substantial growth means substantial need,” he said.

Curtiss Pulitzer, a criminal justice planning consultant from Pulitzer/Bogard & Associates, said the juvenile courts and services facilities are “inadequate,” as they were not designed for such services and have been outgrown. He said the juvenile services facilities are the priority of all the buildings in the project.

Curtiss Pulitzer (copy)

Curtiss Pulitzer presents design plans for the JJJ project at a Public Building Authority meeting in January 2020.

Pulitzer also said the jail’s design does not allow for best practices, as it is small and has an inefficient layout. Additionally, there is no space for those with a mental illness.

“Unfortunately, our jails have become repositories of individuals with serious mental illness,” Pulitzer said. “It’s a sad phenomenon around the country, but it’s true everywhere we go. We want to try and divert as many of these folks from the jail, but they do wind up in the jail, and right now there is no specially designed space or staff for this population.”

He added that with a rebuilt jail, the goal is to have space for pretrial services, where people awaiting a trial can be interviewed and, when appropriate, potentially diverted from the jail in the meantime.

The courts in downtown Franklin also do not have enough space, Pulitzer said. The current courtrooms are too small, and more are needed. There is also not enough space for some staff. Additionally, the layout does not adequately support security, he said.

While the other buildings near Columbia Avenue in Franklin would be demolished in the end, the courts downtown will be renovated and added to, according to the report.

The total estimated cost of this project is $281,897,035, including over $214 million in construction. The largest portion of the cost — at nearly $140 million — is assigned to the jail followed by juvenile services at over $59 million, the sheriff’s office at over $51 million and the courts at about $31.5 million.

JJJ task force project timeline

Pictured is the proposed timeline for the JJJ Project, which includes remodeling of the Williamson County jail, courts, juvenile services facilities and sheriff's office.

This cost would be spread out through 2027 with the most expensive year being 2022, including over $90 million in projected costs.

This report was not tied to an official resolution requiring a vote during the meeting. Each chunk of the project requiring expenditures will go before the commission for approval as it is implemented.

Other business before the board

The commission also voted to fund various additional staff positions for Williamson County Schools, including tech support and health-related positions.

Additionally, the commission accepted a $1.4 million donation from the Friends of the Williamson County Animal Center for the new animal center facility and a $20,000 grant from the PetCo Foundation for the animal control budget.

Animal Center rendering (copy)

Pictured is a rendering of the new Williamson County Animal Center facility.

For more information, visit Watch the full county commission meeting on the Williamson County TV YouTube Channel.

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.